Science Communication

By: Ina Nikoleva This blog post is going to be a little different. It is quite excusable, and dare I say, natural, that when faced with obstacles, like the relentless shrinking of scientific funding (especially for what we now refer to as “basic science”), the looming reality of the “post-truth” society, and the heartbreaking phrase “previous experience required” peppering every job ad, that all of us budding scientists have become The future job. The future interview. The next step.

By Fatu Badiane Markey and Urmimala Basu

By: Zakiya Qualls

 By: Eileen Oni

By: Itzamarie Chevere-Torres

“Good writing is good writing; it doesn’t matter if it is an email”  Danielle Heuer, co-founder of Every Voice Educates and Communication Consultant and Coach for WD Communications, said as she started the presentation on Science Business Writing Workshop.

By: Fatu Badiane Markey

On October 6^th, the Rutgers Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences invited Dr. Eric Prager, Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neuroscience Research, to speak about the problem of scientific reproducibility, how to avoid common pitfalls in conducting research, and best practices for publishing a scientific paper. (Interested in science publishing as a career and/or how Dr. Prager became an editor at Wiley?

Towards the end of April, earlier this year, I had the opportunity to take part in a science advocacy day on Capitol Hill organized by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB). I stumbled across this opportunity as part of an iJOBS event email and decided to apply simply on a whim. If the outcome was in my favor, it would be a great experience to add to my tool belt in my exploration of the policy career field. Fortunately for me, I was accepted!

By: Zakiya Qualls